top of page
  • Janice Cho

Examining a Child's Custody Preference in California Family Court

Updated: Apr 22

In the intricate landscape of family law, the preferences of children regarding custody arrangements after a divorce can be a crucial factor. In California, the family court system recognizes the importance of considering a child's opinion, balancing it with other factors that contribute to their overall well-being. In this article, Oakland child custody lawyer Janice Cho explains how California family courts view a child's preference in determining custody arrangements.

Understanding the Legal Framework

California family courts operate under the guiding principle of the "best interests of the child." This legal standard is paramount in all decisions related to child custody and visitation. While the court acknowledges a child's preference, it is just one of many factors taken into account when determining what arrangement would be in the child's best interests.

Age and Maturity

California family courts take into serious consideration the preferences of children in custody matters, setting a benchmark age of 14 as a significant threshold. At this age, a child is presumed to have the right to testify about their custody preferences, unless the court determines that such testimony would not be in the child's best interest. However, even for children under the age of 14, the court may grant them the ability to testify if it deems it beneficial for their well-being.

The legal framework emphasizes that when a child reaches an age where they possess sufficient capacity to reason and articulate intelligent preferences regarding custody or visitation, the court is mandated to consider and give weight to the child's wishes. This provision is integral when establishing new custody arrangements or modifying existing ones. It underscores the importance of recognizing a child's evolving maturity and ability to contribute meaningfully to decisions that directly impact their living arrangements and familial relationships.

In essence, the law acknowledges that as children grow older, their capacity to form reasoned preferences becomes more substantial. By doing so, the legal system seeks to balance the scales between the child's evolving autonomy and the court's duty to safeguard their best interests. This thoughtful approach aims to ensure that, when appropriate, a child's voice is heard and considered in custody proceedings, aligning with the overarching goal of promoting stability and well-being within the family dynamic.

It's important to understand that even though a child's preference may be taken into account, it may not outweigh other factors in a custody matter.

The Importance of Stability and Continuity

California family courts prioritize providing stability and continuity in a child's life. If a child expresses a strong preference to live with one parent, the court will assess whether this preference aligns with the child's overall well-being and whether it supports the goal of maintaining stability in their living arrangements, school, and community connections.

Parental Influence and Coaching

Courts are vigilant in ensuring that a child's preference is genuine and not the result of undue influence or coaching by one parent. If there are concerns about a child's statements being coerced, the court may investigate the circumstances surrounding the expression of preference and take appropriate action to address any potential manipulation.

Guardian ad Litem and Child Custody Evaluations

In some cases, the court may appoint a guardian ad litem or a child custody evaluator to assess the child's preferences and overall well-being. A guardian ad litem is a representative appointed by the court to advocate for the child's best interests, while a custody evaluator conducts a thorough investigation and makes recommendations to the court. These professionals may interview the child, observe interactions with each parent, and consider other relevant factors.

Modification of Custody Orders

It's important to note that a child's preference may be considered when modification of a custody order is sought. If a child's circumstances or preferences have changed since the initial custody order, the court may revisit the case to ensure that the current arrangement aligns with the child's best interests.

How Oakland Child Custody Lawyer Janice Cho Can Help

In California family court, a child's preference is a factor taken into consideration when determining custody arrangements, but it is not the sole deciding factor. As an experienced family law practitioner in Oakland, California, understanding this nuanced approach can help you navigate custody cases with sensitivity and diligence, ensuring that the legal process serves the well-being of the children involved.

The Law Offices of Janice Cho is a client-oriented law firm specializing in helping individuals understand and resolve family law matters efficiently and effectively. The family law practice provides full representation, mediation, consulting services and brief services. Whether negotiating a settlement or conducting litigation, I am here for you.

I have extensive trial experience and will guide you through the process. Should your case be one that cannot be settled, I will vigorously represent you in the litigation process, while doing my best to make the process tolerable for you and to keep costs under control. I will make sure that I understand your concerns and goals and will answer questions about the substantive issues, the process, the possible outcomes and the consequences so that you can make informed decisions.

Call (510) 925-2651 when you need the assistance of an experienced Oakland child custody lawyer.

5 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All


Los comentarios se han desactivado.
bottom of page